Critique

Hi Tanuj,

Nice work! Your page is well written and informative. I have a few suggestions:

1. I think you should revise your abstract and give an overview of what the wiki page covers.
2. The background section could be placed above the Advantages and Challenges section.
3. A bit more information about how other models compare to the hierarchical model would be helpful as well.

Scores:

• [5] The topic is relevant for the course.
• [5] The writing is clear and the English is good.
• [5] The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds).
• [5] The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand.
• [2] The abstract is a concise and clear summary.
• [5] There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.
• [4] There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code.
• [5] It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic).
• [5] It is correct.
• [4] It was neither too short nor too long for the topic.
• [5] It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page).
• [5] It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki.
• [5] The references and links to external pages are well chosen.
• [4] I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic.
• [4] This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate.

Thanks Adnan. I've updated the page and included your suggestions.