Science:Math Exam Resources/Courses/MATH102/December 2016/Question A 07/Solution 1

From UBC Wiki

(i) Incorrect. exists and , but the derivative is everywhere non-negative so is NOT an extremum.

(ii) Incorrect. has a minimum at , but the derivative does NOT exist at (a corner).

(iii) Incorrect. A function can be decreasing at (-1) and increasing at 1, but have a local max at . Consider a function .

(iv) Correct. Because if and , this means that is an extremum for . (Applying the second derivative test for ). Now suppose for example which implies that is a minimum point for , and therefore by the definition for any in the neighborhood of 0 we have , which is equivalent to being increasing in the neighborhood of 0, so cannot have an extremum at . By the similar argument, we can get the same result in the case of .