Course:CPSC532:StaRAI2020:ProjectQuestions

What to think about for critiquing pages

When critiquing pages, and giving marks, please take the following issues/questions into account. This is subject to change. Feel free to add issues or questions, and edit the them if they do not make sense.

• The topic is relevant for the course.
• The writing is clear and the English is good.
• The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 532 students (where the students have diverse backgrounds).
• The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand.
• The abstract is a concise and clear summary.
• There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.
• There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code.
• It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning (as appropriate for the topic).
• It is correct.
• It was too short or too long for the topic
• It was an appropriate unit for a page (it shouldn't be split into different topics or merged with another page).
• It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki.
• The references and links to external pages are well chosen.
• I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic.
• This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate.