• Q1 (a) • Q1 (b) • Q1 (c) • Q1 (d) • Q1 (e) • Q1 (f) • Q2 (a) • Q2 (b) • Q3 (a) • Q3 (b) • Q3 (c) • Q4 (a) • Q4 (b) • Q4 (c) • Q5 (a) • Q5 (b) • Q5 (c) • Q6 (a) • Q6 (b) • Q7 (a) • Q7 (b) • Q8 (a) • Q8 (b) • Q9 (a) • Q9 (b) • Q10 (a) • Q10 (b) • Q10 (c) •
Question 07 (b) 

Let and be nonempty subsets of the interval [0,1]. Now let be the set (i) Prove that and exist. (ii) Suppose that and , prove that 0 is a lower bound for and 1 is an upper bound for . (iii) Suppose that , prove that . 
Make sure you understand the problem fully: What is the question asking you to do? Are there specific conditions or constraints that you should take note of? How will you know if your answer is correct from your work only? Can you rephrase the question in your own words in a way that makes sense to you? 
If you are stuck, check the hint below. Consider it for a while. Does it give you a new idea on how to approach the problem? If so, try it! 
Hint 

(i) Completness Axiom (ii) This is a straight definition check. (iii) We know form part (ii) that 1 is an upper bound. Proceed by a contradiction to show that it must be the least upper bound. 
Checking a solution serves two purposes: helping you if, after having used the hint, you still are stuck on the problem; or if you have solved the problem and would like to check your work.

Solution 

Found a typo? Is this solution unclear? Let us know here.
Please rate my easiness! It's quick and helps everyone guide their studies. (i) Since is bounded, we have that and exist by the completeness axiom. (ii) Suppose that 0 was not a lower bound. Then there exists a with . Also, there exists numbers and with . As and are both positive (since and are subsets of ) we see this is a contradiction. Suppose that 1 was not an upper bound. Then there exists a with . Also, there exists numbers and with . As and are both positive (since and are subsets of ) numbers less than or equal to 1, we see that and this is a contradiction. (iii) Notice that 1 is the least upper bound hence the supremum. That 1 is a least upper bound was part (ii). If 1 was not the supremum, then there would be some which would be the supremum existing by the completeness axiom. Now, choose a value of such that . Since 1 is the supremum of both and , there exist elements and such that . With this chosen, we see that . Thus but is larger than which was the supremum. this is a contradiction and thus the supremum must indeed be 1. 