Pop is about speaking everybody's language.The imagery and iconography we instantly recognize. When you can rely on things that the public already knows, you're dealing with Pop. (Nuno Roque)
Welcome to the "Keywords in Chinese Popular Culture" project for ASIA 319: Contemporary Chinese Popular Cultures.
In his book Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society, Raymond Williams described “keywords” as important elements in a living vocabulary which not simply reflects social and cultural problems, but also participates in the transformations of society and history. New kinds of relationship, and new ways of seeing existing relationships, often first appear and occur within vocabulary: in the invention of new terms, in the adaptation and alteration of older terms, and in continuous extension or transfer of existing terms. Keywords invite research and reflection because debates about media, culture, and society can be enhanced by an increased understanding of the multiple genealogies of their structuring terms and the diverse conflicts and disagreements embedded in differing usages of those terms.
What are the Keywords?
The keywords are by no means specialized vocabulary of a specialized discipline, but the vocabulary we share with others when we discuss many of the central aspects of our common life. In terms of its functions, the keyword is 1) the significant binding word in certain activities, whose usage bound together certain ways of seeing culture and society; 2) the word indicative of certain forms of thoughts (political beliefs and ideologies), and 3) the enabler for any cultural, social and political analysis, problem-solving, and interpretations.
Why Compile a Keyword Wiki?
Locating and studying keywords for the moment is a way of recording, investigating, and presenting problems of meaning in our era. Taking keywords at the level of their general usages will contribute to enhancing our aesthetic awareness, cultural sensitivity, and cognitive capacity for clarification. An exploration of the living vocabulary in our social and cultural discussion will also enable us to be more conscious and critical of the precise historical conditions where the keyword emerges. We neither posit any fixed tradition to be learned nor a consensus to be reached, but recognize this Keyword Wiki as a force that shapes and reshapes, in real circumstances of Chinese popular culture, and from profoundly different yet important perspectives, a living vocabulary to examine our own life and recreate our own language, identity, and history.
This project asks each group to construct a keyword entry of around 2,800 words in length (exclusive of references, diagrams, photographs), focusing on a term or word/s in scenes of contemporary Chinese popular cultures. In 2020-21, our starting point is to build what can be called a cluster of interrelated words and references under the aegis of Aesthetic Categories in Chinese Popular Culture.
Your objective in this assignment is to briefly trace, review, and describe, with citations from the primary and secondary materials (be it printed or digital), how a number of authors, mediators, and audience utilize this keyword in what kinds of context, and how divergent even contradictory voices converge in the deployment of this keyword. You should identify a network of usages, references, and perspectives that are in history and for the moment, as well as the internal development and external context of the keyword. More importantly, you should articulate what inquiry-oriented questions emerge from your group’s investigations into this keyword and its significance in a scholarly discussion. You should demonstrate (a) your ability to extract and summarize relevant facts, comments, discussions, and arguments, and (b) your capacity to rationalize and present logical suggestions for further studies on some aspect of contemporary Chinese popular culture. As such, its entries are not simply “opinion pieces” nor summaries, but a thoughtful and logical documentations on how the keyword is used, accompanied by ongoing questions raised by the keyword. You are not required to make an original argument and elaborate on that in this project (reserve that for your individual final project).
- Instructors pick up a range of keywords in Chinese popular cultures, those of an especially problematical kind.
- Students group themselves by each signing up for the keyword entry they want to contribute to. (through “People” on Canvas).
- Student be introduced to Keyword wiki and how to construct entries. A workshop will be organized on what it means to contribute in Open space, and how to edit Wiki project by Educational Resources Developers at UBC Centre for Teaching, Learning and Technology.
- Student work in groups to contribute to the Keyword Wiki. Document each group meeting you have in the discussion board of your group collaboration site on Canvas. In the first meeting, each group should create and sign off a team contract: specify the division of labor in each team; specify the roles of group members in your meeting: facilitator, questioner, recorder, spokesperson, reflector (find more details in your group discussion board on Canvas). In your second meeting, you should build a list of potential questions you plan to explore based on the confirmed topic, a few reliable and neutral sources of information (you can post them in the group discussion board as a record). Ideally, each group member should locate and write on at least one primary source and one secondary source. For all the examples the group identified, select to elaborate on those that can cohere into a single and unified sequence in your article.
- Add your keyword to the Index, alphabetically. Create a New Page for that word. Add your keyword entry text to that new page. Link the Keyword in the Index to the page you just created for that keyword.
- Student individually submit the URL of their Wiki article on Canvas. Together with the URL, you will also write a short memo on your group work experience to describe what you experienced and learned as a team at the beginning, development and completion stages of the project (More details on Canvas assignment).
- Students fill out peer evaluation within each group (I-Peer).
This is only a suggested structure. It is very likely that you will need to modify this structure to fit your topic:
- Introduction: an inquiry into an area of general meanings and connections of meaning. Why an inquiry into this keyword is important? Why should people care about your project?
- The genesis of the keyword: How does it emerge in Chinese popular culture? How does it become popular in Chinese popular culture?
- A brief glossary of its explicit dictionary meanings: its general and variable usages, philological and etymological roots, and dictionary histories of definitions of the word (historical usages and evolvement), paying attention to the continuity and discontinuity in its historical usages (be brief, no need to copy and paste entries from dictionary);
- An elaboration of its variegated meanings, actual usages, and value-loaded implications in Chinese popular culture, to be substantiated with concrete examples. The actual meanings and their implications are typically diverse and variable. The most active problems of meaning are always embedded in actual usages of the keywords. The section can be further divided into five:
- The multiple explicit meanings and implicit connections people make when use the keywords to discuss their everyday experiences and popular culture scenes. For instance, find out how the keyword is used in academic readings, in the popular press, and in the online discussions by providing short citations (with linked references);
- A shared body of words associated with the keyword (could be synonyms and antonyms or hypernyms) in our general discussions of Chinese popular culture and society;
- Can you find a counterpart term in any Western or non-Chinese popular cultures? Compare the multiple terms from different languages but sharing a similar meaning.
- Compare and summarize multiple meanings in their distinct contexts while digging into a range of ideas and values;
- How dictionary meanings are transferred, distorted, or subverted? For example, how does the keyword originate in one language and migrate to another language? How does the keyword originate in one context and get subverted, misused, or renewed in another context (e.g. the word tongzhi was a socialist word for comrades, but now become a synonyms for queer/gay after migrating via different cultural spheres and regions)? After its origination in the Chinese popular culture scene, what about the international reception and appropriation of the keyword? The original meanings of words are always interesting but what is more interesting is the subsequent variations.
- What social, cultural, and political problems are suggested through the usage of the term? Many of these social, political, and intellectual issues and conflicts are thought through as we are conscious of the keywords as elements of the problems. Tip: Focus on the moments when scholars, journalists, reviewers, or the public make complaints over the practice, institution, or perspective implied by the keyword. Those moments are often very telling occasions for you to diagnose the actual developments and meanings of the term, especially their extension, variation and transfer. Also the "political problems" mentioned here include but extend beyond the realm of the government's censorship or the state's policy; sometimes, the subcultural communities' relationship to the mainstream culture or the dominant ideology (like consumerism) could also be political (we call it subculture's politics). You can find your own interpretations on this aspect. This question also ties to the question--why does this word become popular in the contemporary Chinese societies.
- Find and summarize existing studies related to the keywords. Incorporate scholarships from several different disciplines, such as literary studies, cultural studies, anthropology, psychology, sociology, etc. Discuss how several disciplines converge into your research--make sure all the studies you cite are relevant to popular culture studies. You might comment on the existing studies and recommend amendment, correction and addition as your scholarly responses (but this is entire optional and should not be the focus of this project);
- Conclusion: You should conclude your Wiki paper by summarizing the topic, or some aspect of the topic, and if possible, briefly suggest a position or a direction for future investigation or research.
- substantiate your summary and analysis with telling multimedia examples, be it an image, a text, or a video;
- find your own appropriate examples; engage in rhetorical analysis while paying attention to the social and political context;
- focus on the controversies and conflicts in the multiple usages of the word;
- identify the possible solutions or efforts that are currently underway to tackle the issue or problem (if there is any);
- For an exemplary study on the pop culture aesthetic category of 萌 (cuteness): http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/789/0.
- Ensure that you use reliable sources (e.g. peer reviewed literature, esteemed journalistic reports, your own field-notes). Citing a reliable newspaper or media is acceptable, only when you cannot find another more reliable source;
- Use the Wikipedia reference style (see Wikipedia:Inline citation);
- Provide a citation for every sentence, statement, thought, or bit of data not your own, giving the author, year, AND page number in the reference list (if quoting textually);
- You can reference foreign-language sources but translate the reference to English.
A Note on included Graphics, Multimedia, and Hyperlinks:
- EXCELLENT - Images, multimedia sources and hyperlinks enhance quality of information; all acknowledged with captions or annotations
- GOOD - Images, multimedia sources and hyperlinks support quality of information; all acknowledged with captions or annotations
- BASIC - Insufficient number of images, multimedia sources and hyperlinks were used to support information
- UNACCEPTABLE - Images and graphics have little to do with the topic
The project is worth 20% of your final course grade. The grading rubric for this project is as follows: 
||(3 points) Present comprehensive yet divergent views with appropriate balance: both positive and negative views are included. At least three to four views are provided without much overlap or reiteration, including a Chinese and Non-Chinese culture comparison. All the views are cited from reliable sources.
|(3 points) Different views are each supported and illustrated by at least one piece of effective evidence. At least three to four pieces of evidence are provided in the article, including counterpart examples from non-Chinese cultures if possible.
||(3 points) Use a consistent structure to segment the article (such as grouping related information, defining specialized vocabulary, providing a road-map) and present all the information in a logical progression, including an introduction and a conclusion.
||(2 points) Use neutral language and emphasize existing facts (examples and views). Your entry should read like an encyclopedia page rather than a persuasive essay.
|(2 points) Explains the key ideas clearly, concisely, adequately and logically compelling with few errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling.
|(2 points) Accurately cites all sources of information to support the credibility and authority of the information presented; consistently use standard bibliographic format to cite sources.
|(2 points) Select high-quality graphics and multimedia when appropriate to enhance and clarify the content. No unnecessary or irrelevant illustrations.
||(3 points) Contributes equally with other group members in researching, writing, and editing; have your meeting notes, memos, and/or distribution of labor specified in the discussion board of the group Canvas site (this is to encourage you to use discussion board to communicate with each other); submit individual memo of group project experience; submit anonymous I-Peer evaluation.
Sharing Your Work
All wiki project pages are openly accessible on the Internet. If you would like to give permission for other people to use them (for example, by including them on the UBC Open Case Studies Site), the project template includes a green box that allows you to add your name(s) as author(s) of the resource and indicate if you'd like to share your work via a Creative Commons license . If you would like, add a name for who or what project created the resource, add that info after the names parameters. If left blank, it will default to Course:ASIA319.
The following is all optional but if you’d like your name added to the page as author as well allowing other people to re-use it as a conservation resource, you can:
- Click on the edit tab to edit your page
- Then scroll to the bottom and click on the green box at the bottom of the page
- This will generate a little pop-up with an edit button. Push the edit button.
- In the names field, add your name if you would like to be credited as the author
- In the share field, add “yes” (must be lowercase) if you would like to allow other folks to be able to reuse your page, such as by including it on the UBC open case studies site at http://cases.open.ubc.ca/. Clicking yes adds a creative commons license to the page.