Course talk:CPSC522/MarchApril2020

From UBC Wiki

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
critique020:28, 22 April 2020

In the summary section why is information capitalized? Maybe include links in the related/build on sections?

In the feature selection section you use the past tense for your own study "all of the features were scaled" but then you use present tense "samples are grouped". But in the section before you used future tense "we will employ a leave one out". Maybe be consistent in using the past tense for the original study, and the present or future (pick one and stick to it) for your study? I would suggest using the present. Or at least make it more clear when using the past tense for the original study and when it is the past tense of your study (as you have already done it so it is in the past).

I would retitle the discussion section the conclusion as you don't really discuss (unless you plan to add more to it). I think you have a good structure and good explanations of what you are doing and why as well as solid presentation of the results.I think it would be expected to cite the original study in the bibliography?

Other than that, great page!!


The topic is relevant for the course. 5 The writing is clear and the English is good. 4 The page is written at an appropriate level for CPSC 522 students. 5 The formalism (definitions, mathematics) was well chosen to make the page easier to understand. 5 The abstract is a concise and clear summary. 5 There were appropriate (original) examples that helped make the topic clear.- There was appropriate use of (pseudo-) code. - It had a good coverage of representations, semantics, inference and learning. 5 It is correct. 5 It was neither too short nor too long for the topic. 5 It was an appropriate unit for a page. 5 It links to appropriate other pages in the wiki. 1 The references and links to external pages are well chosen. 1 I would recommend this page to someone who wanted to find out about the topic. 5 This page should be highlighted as an exemplary page for others to emulate. 4 If I was grading it out of 20, I would give it: 19

SvetlanaSodol (talk)20:27, 22 April 2020